Texts often represent women as victims In a patriarchal society. How are women represented in two of the poems set for study? During the late 20th Century women remained constrained by gender ideals which they were expected to conform to; subservience, piety and beauty. This domineering state of Inferiority experienced by these women is expressed and challenged by both Mary Elizabeth Coleridge and Amy Lowell through their exploration of the visitation of women in a patriarchal society..
The underlying desire for freedom, which the poets Coleridge and Lowell illustrate in their respective poems The Other Side of the Mirror and Patterns, brings awareness to the repressive and harsh environment women have previously been brought up In. The ideal of femininity, imposed by the patriarchy, particularly highlights the Importance of the physical beauty of women. To men, women have been Identified as a prized possession, acknowledged merely for their physical attributes, suggesting the demonstration of women and how their female experiences become trivial.
Coleridge The Other Side of the Mirror, exemplifies this In ‘a face bereft of vileness’ which stresses the essential aspect of beauty through the positive connotations of ‘loveliness’. This same face is then suggested as one that ‘no man on earth could guess’, further emphasizing how, without beauty, women are discarded from the thoughts of men. Similarly, Lowell highlights the importance and expectations of feminine beauty through the representation of the ‘fine brocaded gown’ which places both a physical and symbolic restriction on the persona In Patterns.
The movement of the natural environment, ‘blowing’ and ‘flutter[ins] in the Reese’, Juxtaposes with the constraint of the ‘stiff brocaded gown’ which depicts the Idealized hourglass physique of a woman, despite the apparent difficulty In breathing and inability to walk comfortably. The use of the plosive sound ‘k’ in ‘brocaded’ further creates an uneasy feeling of jerky stops and starts, which is likewise accentuated by the action of ‘tripping’. Adding to the depth of harsh feeling. This discomfort stems from the suppression of women in the Victorian age, symbolized through the predictable nature of ‘patterns’.
Like the rigid construction ND entrapment of patterns. Coleridge structures her poem using a strong rhyming scheme of to enforce the idea of unavoidable confinement. For the two persona (from each text), they are expected by the patriarchal society to oblige to these patterns, however the poems reveal that women yearn to break free from the acceptable public face which they project to the world. The Inability for the female characters to express their true self has required them to maintain a private face, and thus leading to inner turmoil. Coleridge explores the seductive effect on emotions which suppression instigates in women.
The persona In The Other Side of the Mirror is established as someone who Is troubled and severely depressed through the alliteration of ‘wild… Womanly despair’, emphasizing the vile consequences of living a false and restrictive life. Unfortunately women must and in secret bled’ which creates a whispering tone and conveys a lack of expression. The Other Side of the Mirror can be interpreted through a Christian reading where the private mayhem of the persona, and ultimately for all women governed by the tetrarch, is represented by the excruciating experience of Jesus Christ during his crucifixion.
The religious allusion of ‘the thorny aureole’ depicts an image of a thorny halo, much like the crown of thorns Jesus wore, which shows how women were victimized in the society which they lived in. The woman’s reflection is paralleled to a messiah figure, suffering from injuries caused by men in power, and the crown of thorns represents the dominance and authoritative nature of men. The consequence of the male expectation causes the persona suppressed inward anger and feelings urn outward and take away her loveliness, consuming her whole being.
The inner turmoil of the persona in Patterns is represented by a ‘war’. Wars too are conceptualized as patterns through its cyclical nature in which men adamantly partake it. The word ‘war’ generates negative connotations of death, raw pain and bloodiness which create a dark and ominous undertone to the poem, and additionally highlighting the silent battle for freedom. The statement of ‘weep[ins]’ reveals a characteristic of women as an emotional being and highlights the emotional effect of visitation.
However Coleridge and Lowell no longer want to maintain the oppression of women and express their intentions of uncovering the private face, evident in the change of viewpoint in both texts. The fourth stanza of The Other Side of the Mirror takes a slightly different stance than the previous stanzas. Whereas the previous are concerned with the woman’s injuries and her feelings of woe, this stanza starts with the description of her eyes as ‘lurid’ which suggests an air of violence and power, prompted by her ‘dying… Hopes’.
The kinetic imagery of the leaping fire’ further enhances the anger and depth of her feelings. Loser’s Patterns, on the other hand, reveals how the persona has taken on a more dominant role apparent in the use of anaphora’s of ‘l would’ and ‘l should’ which encompasses an almost imperative quality. Just like the final line ‘Christ! What are patterns for? ‘ questions the occurrence of patterns in a distressed and irritated tone Coleridge too uses an exclamatory tone in ‘O set the crystal surface free! ‘ which is suggestive of the urgency to let the true self emerge.